If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?
11.06.2025 02:28

Child pornography
Insider trading
Freedom of speech does not apply to:
Russell Wilson: Nothing changes for me with Jaxson Dart here - NBC Sports
Terroristic threats
Insurrection
Threats of violence
Fraud
You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
Revealing classified information
Why did my ex-narcissist move so fast with his new supply marriage engagement moving in, etc.?
You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
No freedom is absolute.
That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.
HIPAA violations
Trade secrets
If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.
Perjury
False advertising
Conspiracy
And much, much more.
Revenge porn